ArticlePsychopharmacology2026
Time-based prospective memory impairment in adults who smoke: the role of internal and external attention and cue-based intervention.
Article in Psychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleLong term smoking can cause sustained damage to time-based prospective memory (TBPM). However, the specific processing mechanism of smoking induced TBPM damage is not yet clear, and there is a lack of effective intervention measures.
objectivesThis study systematically explores the mechanism of smoking's impact on TBPM from attention perspective and suggests its improvement effect
methodsThe experiment adopted a dual task paradigm, randomly dividing 76 adults who smoke (with a smoking history of 2-5 years and smoking more than 10 cigarettes per day) into a smoking non-reminder group and a smoking reminder group, and recruiting 32 non-smokers as a non-smoking group.
resultsThe results showed that the accuracy of TBPM in the smoking non-reminder group was significantly lower than that in both the smoking reminder group and the non-smoking group, and was also accompanied by lower time‑monitoring effectiveness. The smoking non-reminder group had the highest frequency of time checking, followed by the non-smoking group, and the smoking reminder group had the lowest.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that adults who smoke present a dual deficit characterized by insufficient internal attention and reduced external attention effectiveness. However, reminders can effectively improve the TBPM performance of adults who smoke by reducing the demands of internal attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42836956What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.