ArticleClinical rheumatology2026
Sex differences in rheumatoid arthritis: results of a cross-sectional study.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRheumatoid arthritis (RA) shows sex-related differences, but the expression across clinical domains remains inconsistent. We compared women and men with RA and explored characteristics associated with male sex.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 240 adults with RA (160 women and 80 men). Demographic, clinical, laboratory, radiographic, treatment, and comorbidity data were compared by sex. An exploratory multivariable logistic regression model, with male sex coded as 1, was used to identify distinguishing characteristics.
resultsWomen were older and had higher body mass index, DAS28-CRP, pain, morning stiffness, and HAQ-DI scores. Men had a numerically shorter disease duration, but the difference was not statistically significant (7.46 vs 8.73 years; p = 0.158). CRP was higher in men (20.1 vs 14.1 mg/L; p = 0.003), whereas depression, fibromyalgia, hypertension, osteoporosis, and obesity were more frequent in women. Men more often received methotrexate; women more often received leflunomide, biologic therapy, and higher monthly glucocorticoid exposure. Radiographic erosion prevalence did not differ in the crude comparison. In the exploratory adjusted model, erosions were associated with male sex (aOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.15-3.20). Biologic therapy, higher HAQ-DI, older age, and higher body mass index were inversely associated with male sex. The DAS28-CRP score was not independently associated with sex after adjustment.
conclusionsWomen had greater symptomatic, functional, and comorbidity burdens, whereas men had higher CRP and an exploratory adjusted association with erosions. These findings highlight important sex-related differences in RA and support the need for sex-specific approaches to disease assessment and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42836942What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.