SynthesisAdvances in therapy2026
Questionable Evidence for Berberine in Polyendocrine Metabolic Ovarian Syndrome: An Integrity-Based Reappraisal.
Synthesis in Advances in therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPrior systematic reviews suggest that berberine may match or exceed the effects of metformin on metabolic and hormonal outcomes in polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome (PMOS; previously referred to as polycystic ovary syndrome). This review aimed to assess the reported efficacy of berberine and act as an integrity-based reappraisal of available evidence in women with PMOS.
methodsA systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines and prospectively registered. MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and CINAHL were searched from inception to October 2025. Randomised controlled trials examining berberine supplementation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome were eligible for inclusion. Outcomes of interest included metabolic, hormonal, and anthropometric measures. All eligible trials underwent independent integrity assessment using two validated frameworks: the Research Integrity in Guidelines and Evidence Synthesis framework and the Trustworthiness in Randomised Controlled Trials checklist. Studies rated as moderate or high risk of compromised integrity were excluded from quantitative synthesis. Authors were contacted for clarification prior to exclusion.
resultsAll four trials (n = 452) that met eligibility criteria were independently rated as high risk for compromised integrity, and were not included in quantitative synthesis. Concerns included absent trial registration, implausible recruitment timelines, and potential duplication of data. No clarifying responses were received. While improvements in insulin resistance, lipid profiles, and androgen markers were reported, these findings cannot be considered reliable given the identified concerns.
conclusionsOur review demonstrates that reliable conclusions regarding the efficacy of berberine in PMOS cannot be drawn from the current evidence base.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42836929What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.