Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42836917›Full record

ArticleNursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals2026

Nursing Werk

Jess Dillard-Wright

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jess Dillard-WrightUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4646-5199

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nursing imaginary is populated with a plurality of feminine and feminized archetypes. These images reinforce a particular order of things for nurses and nursing, marching out well-worn stereotypes link gender and sexuality. Less attention has been paid to the productive, affirmative, and playful dimensions of these archetypes and the possibilities they offer. Using feminist theory, queer theory, and lessons from camp, I ask why sometimes it might be useful to be a Madonna or a whore or a battleax. Recognising some potential for misunderstanding, I want to be clear that I am neither dismissing these myths as innocuous or unproblematic nor am I endorsing any particular version as the way, the truth, the life for nurses. Rather than a fixed identity or intractable cage, I want to stay with the trouble to think through what happens when we conceptualise these tropes as personas or characters nurses may don and doff at will like personal protective equipment, stylized to suit the cast with whom they perform, inclusive of patients and colleagues alike. I do this not as a technique to undermine the professionalism of nurses or nursing but rather to recognise this kind of performance as an important piece of emotional triage, acknowledging the skilful affective decision-making that goes into choosing how to occupy a particular role in a particular moment to elicit particular outcomes, conjuring the realities and feelings and ethics. Attending to nursing in this way, I think, can offer some points of entry for thinking about nursing and its work differently: playful, practiced, performative, powerful.

Indexed as

Philosophy, NursingFeminismHumanscampgendernursingqueer theory

Identifiers

PMID42836917
PMCPMC13641178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.