Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42836904›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026

Scoliosis Induction in the Porcine Spine Using a Growth-Modulating Posterior Tether: Finite Element Model Development and Calibration.

Christian R D'Andrea, Mattan R Orbach, Alessandra Fusco, Edward J Vresilovic, Brian D Snyder, Thomas P Schaer, Patrick J Cahill, Sriram Balasubramanian

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christian R D'AndreaSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Science, and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5193-3076
Mattan R OrbachSidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5178-7742
Alessandra FuscoDepartment of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, PA, 19348, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4318-7739
Edward J VresilovicDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19711, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9591-8409
Brian D SnyderDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1482-9509
Thomas P SchaerDepartment of Clinical Studies, New Bolton Center, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Kennett Square, PA, 19348, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4340-8212
Patrick J CahillDivision of Orthopaedics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7129-1007
Sriram BalasubramanianSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Science, and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. sb939@drexel.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7886-6184

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePredictable correction of early onset scoliosis through mechanical modulation of endochondral growth requires understanding vertebral stress-growth relationships. Here, we develop image-based finite element models (FEMs) to estimate vertebral stress-growth relationships under prescribed loading conditions using a porcine model of spine deformity induced mechanically via a posterolateral tether, assuming that, after initial tether-induced elastic deformation, subsequent deformity develops solely from vertebral endochondral growth against the tether and elastic anatomical structures.

methodsImage-based FEMs were generated to simulate juvenile Yorkshire pigs instrumented with a posterolateral tether implant which applied asymmetric force across the spine. FEM growth parameters were calibrated to best match in vivo data using landmark points obtained from 3D imaging for each pig.

resultsAsymmetric stresses generated by loading of the posterolateral offset cable produced multi-planar spine deformity. Calibrated FEMs achieved moderate agreement with frontal plane projections of the deformity: Cobb angle (MAE = 4.6-8.5° across all pigs and timepoints) and anatomic landmark point correspondence (MAE = 2.1-2.9 mm), but sagittal plane agreement was more limited, partly attributable to variability in positioning during imaging. FEM-derived vertebral body growth rates were reduced for vertebrae along the concavity of the deformity.

conclusionImage-based FEMs estimated vertebral stress-growth relationships and reproduced deformity with comparable Cobb angle error to an existing parametric FE model (current 2.5 ± 1.6° vs. reported ~ 2.0 ± 2.4° in a single-pig matched comparison) with realistic baseline IVD stresses (current ~ 0.45 MPa vs. reported 0.48 MPa in the growth plate). With expanded validation, such models may support preclinical evaluation of implant designs and surgical configurations prior to in vivo testing.

Indexed as

Finite elementGrowth modulationImplantPorcineScoliosisSpine biomechanicsTether

Identifiers

PMID42836904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.