Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42836771›Full record

ArticleeLife2026

Scanning and active sampling behaviours emerge from conserved insect neural circuits.

Cody A Freas, Antoine Wystrach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cody A FreasResearch Center on Animal Cognition (CRCA), Center for Integrative Biology (CBI), CNRS, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7026-1255
Antoine WystrachResearch Center on Animal Cognition (CRCA), Center for Integrative Biology (CBI), CNRS, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3273-7483

Funding

European Research Council RESIL-ANT 101125881Macquarie University MQRF0001094
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Navigating insects often pause and rotate to sample their surroundings, behaviours termed scanning. These and other active sampling behaviours embody navigational uncertainty and are key for spatial learning, yet their neural basis remains unclear and existing models impose scanning behaviours rather than explaining its emergence. Here, we show that desert ants' scanning dynamics can emerge spontaneously from the same conserved neural circuits used for goal-directed navigation, without requiring a specialised scanning module. We built a biologically grounded model combining central complex steering and lateral accessory lobe oscillators and added a downstream stochastic inhibition of forward speed. This minimal system produced diverse, realistic scan dynamics; saccades, fixations, and reversals, whose features were qualitatively compared to high-speed video recordings of

Indexed as

AntsNerve NetSpatial NavigationAnimalscentral complexcentral pattern generatordistributed motor controlecologyinsect navigationlateral accessory lobesoscillations

Identifiers

PMID42836771
PMCPMC13641763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.