ReviewClinical and experimental dental research2026
Hantavirus in Dentistry: Occupational Exposure Considerations and a Proposed Tiered Infection Prevention and Control Framework-A Narrative Review.
Review in Clinical and experimental dental research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study is to synthesize evidence on hantavirus transmission and occupational exposure pathways relevant to dentistry, and to propose an evidence-informed tiered infection prevention and control (IPC) framework that distinguishes established from theoretical risk. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe initial narrative search covered database inception through May 15, 2026 in MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, and WHO/CDC/ECDC/OSHA sources, followed by a targeted PubMed/MEDLINE and public-health guidance update through August 18, 2026. Approximately 1450 records were identified. After duplicate removal, 1070 records were subjected to title/abstract screening, 215 full-text records were assessed for eligibility, and 45 sources were included in the final synthesis, comprising 34 peer-reviewed publications and 11 gray-literature or public-health guidance sources.
resultsEnvironmental exposure to infected-rodent contamination is the established occupational pathway. Limited person-to-person transmission is documented for the Andes virus (ANDV), but no dental transmission has been reported. ANDV RNA and culture-based infectivity have been demonstrated in some oral/respiratory fluids; however, dental-aerosol transmission has not been shown. Dental-specific occupational risk therefore remains unquantified.
conclusionsNo dental transmission has been documented, and patient-related risk remains uncertain. Standard precautions and rodent control are foundational; suspected or confirmed ANDV warrants transmission-based precautions and airborne precautions for aerosol-generating procedures according to current guidance. The proposed dental tiers are evidence-informed, author-derived, and unvalidated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.