ArticleLymphatics2026
Towards Clinically Useful Quantitative Lymphoscintigraphy: A Scoping Review.
Article in Lymphatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Lymphedema is a chronic condition marked by swelling in the body's soft tissues due to impaired or damaged lymphatic function. Lymphedema is estimated to affect about 1 in 1000 in the United States and 1.4 per 1000 based on two European studies. Lymphedema diagnosis relies on clinical visual assessment by physicians, and the quantitative evaluation of lymphatic function is not widely employed due to the lack of standardized and validated metrics. Lymphoscintigraphy is considered the practical gold standard for evaluating lymphedema. With the emergence of advanced surgical therapies, there is a growing demand for quantitative evaluation metrics to objectively evaluate treatment response. To address this unmet need, we reviewed various methods of quantitative lymphoscintigraphy (qLSG) that were used for assessing lymphedema. We found that multiple qLSG approaches have been described. Moreover, the protocols vary widely in terms of tracer type, injection route, dosage, and exercise interventions. We compared the quantitative assessment strategies and highlighted the approaches that may help provide a more objective lymphedema diagnosis and follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.