ArticleArab journal of urology2026
Arabic translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric validation of the satisfaction survey for inflatable penile implant: The SSIPI-AR.
Article in Arab journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To culturally adapt and psychometrically validate an Arabic version of the Satisfaction Survey for Inflatable Penile Implant (SSIPI-AR) for assessing patient satisfaction after inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation among Arabic-speaking men. Methods: We performed a cross-cultural translation and validation study of the 16-item SSIPI using forward translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert committee review, and pilot testing. Adult Arabic-speaking men (≥18 years) who had undergone IPP implantation 6 months to 5 years prior were recruited. Participants completed the SSIPI-AR at baseline and again after 2 weeks. Construct validity was evaluated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Reliability was assessed via internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and test - retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC). Satisfaction was summarized using total and domain scores. Results: Fifty men were included (mean age 57.5 ± 10.5 years). EFA supported retention of all 16 items with acceptable sampling adequacy (KMO = 0.505) and a significant Bartlett's test ( Conclusions: The SSIPI-AR demonstrates strong construct validity, high internal consistency, and excellent test - retest reliability, supporting its use as a brief, culturally appropriate, implant-specific patient-reported outcome measure for quantifying satisfaction after IPP implantation in Arabic-speaking populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.