ArticleResearch in pharmaceutical sciences2026
Systems biology-driven drug repurposing in glioblastoma
Article in Research in pharmaceutical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive brain tumor with limited treatment options and poor patient survival. This study aimed to identify key genes and altered pathways in GBM and to explore potential drug-repurposing candidates using a systems biology approach. Experimental approach: We analyzed gene expression data from two public datasets (GSE4290 and GSE50161) using Transcriptome Analysis Console. These datasets included 102 GBM samples and 23 non-tumor brain samples. We identified differentially expressed genes using statistical thresholds. A protein-protein interaction network was built using STRING and analyzed in Cytoscape based on degree, betweenness, and closeness metrics. Pathway analysis was carried out using KEGG. Survival analysis was performed with GEPIA2. Drug-gene interactions were screened using DGIdb, and molecular docking was carried out for selected targets. Findings/Results: A total of 1,704 upregulated and 1,345 downregulated genes were detected. Network analysis highlighted TP53, EGFR, CDC42, and STAT3 as central hub genes. Pathway analysis showed major changes in MAPK signaling, neuroactive ligand-receptor interaction, and extracellular matrix-receptor interaction. Higher expression of CDC42, EGFR, and TP53 was associated with shorter overall survival in GBM patients. Drug screening identified 28 approved compounds targeting six core genes. Docking analysis showed strong binding affinity for several candidates, with scores of -8.5 kcal/mol or lower. Conclusion and implications: This study identified important molecular targets and pathways in GBM and suggests several existing drugs with potential value for therapeutic repurposing. These findings may support future experimental and clinical studies in GBM treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.