ArticleSubstance abuse and rehabilitation2026
Leveraging Machine Learning to Predict Quit Attempts Among Adult Cigarette Smokers.
Article in Substance abuse and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Cigarette smoking is the leading preventable cause of premature death in the US. Quitting can significantly reduce the risk of adverse health effects. However, much is unknown about the factors prospectively associated with the behavioral step of making a quit attempt. The present study leveraged supervised machine learning, data from a prior experimental study, and exploratory methods to investigate longitudinal associations between smoking history, cognitive and behavioral indices, and quit attempts reported at a four-week follow-up assessment. Aims and Methods: Secondary analysis of a project that enrolled 278 adult cigarette smokers (18-69 years old) for a prospective study of predictors of making a quit attempt(s). Analyses were based on N = 231 with non-missing data through the one-month follow-up, separated into training (n = 185, of whom 36 made a quit attempt) and testing (n =46, of whom 9 made a quit attempt) subsets. Results: In the testing subset, a random forest model with class weights to address class imbalance and a linear support vector machine model performed best of the models tested, albeit not very well (eg, F Conclusion: While reliable predictions of quit attempts were not obtained across the train-test split, the present study leverages bottom-up, data-driven approaches, and machine learning methods to explore the understudied behavioral step of initiating a quit attempt. Future studies should continue exploring predictors of quit attempts, along with how they may differ from predictors of sustained smoking cessation. Data-driven machine learning methods have the potential to progress precision medicine efforts by clarifying generalizable mechanisms underlying clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.