ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2026
Metaphyseal cones in septic revision total knee arthroplasty: A retrospective cohort study with minimum 2-year follow-up.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Metaphyseal cones improve fixation and address bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA), but their use in septic revision remains controversial because of theoretical concerns about biofilm formation on porous surfaces, and evidence confined to the septic setting is scarce. We aimed to describe infection eradication, implant survival and functional outcomes and the metaphyseal microbiological environment after cone implantation in septic rTKA. Methods: This multicentre retrospective single-arm cohort study included consecutive patients undergoing septic rTKA with at least one porous tritanium metaphyseal cone at two centres between January 2016 and December 2023. Periprosthetic joint infection was diagnosed by the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) 2021 criteria. In one-stage revisions, an additional metaphyseal bone sample was obtained during reaming for cone implantation. The primary outcome was infection eradication at a minimum 24-month follow-up; infection-free implant survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier. Secondary outcomes were metaphyseal culture positivity in one-stage patients and functional scores (Knee Society Score [KSS], Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC], EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire [EQ-5D-5L], EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale [EQ-VAS]) at last follow-up. Results: Thirty-four patients (mean age 70.3 ± 8.3 years; 55.9% female) were included: 18 (52.9%) one-stage and 16 (47.1%) two-stage revisions. Median follow-up was 44 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 35-50). Infection was eradicated in 31 patients (91.2%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 75.1%-97.1%); all three failures occurred by 14 months. Metaphyseal cultures were positive in 12 of 18 one-stage patients (66.7%, 95% CI: 43.7-83.7). Cones were removed in three patients. Median functional scores were KSS Knee 80, KSS Functional 60, WOMAC Physical Function 17 and EQ-VAS 70. Conclusion: In this cohort, cone implantation in septic rTKA was associated with a high infection eradication rate and durable implant survival, with three cone removals. The 66.7% metaphyseal culture positivity in one-stage patients is an exploratory finding that may reflect occult infection or sample contamination and cannot be generalised beyond this subgroup. These findings support cones as a reconstructive option in septic rTKA. Level of Evidence: Level IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.