ArticlePatient preference and adherence2026
Does Provider's Supportive Communication Enhance Trust and Treatment Adherence Attitudes in Mild and Severe Dysfunction Scenarios? A Web-Based Experimental Study.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The way healthcare providers communicate with patients can influence patients' trust in providers and their attitudes toward treatment adherence. The present study investigated whether such influences of providers' communication can be modulated by dysfunction severity and participant gender. Participants and Methods: In an online experiment, participants (N = 508) were instructed to imagine having either mild or severe olfactory dysfunction (OD). They were then randomized to watch a video of a healthcare provider delivering an olfactory training (OT) as a treatment for OD, with either neutral or emotionally supportive communication. Participants then rated their perceived trust in the provider, attitudes toward treatment effectiveness, treatment engagement, treatment unpleasantness, and treatment risk. State anxiety was measured before and after watching the videos. Results: Supportive communication elicited higher trust in the provider than neutral communication, with a small to medium effect size (Cohen's Conclusion: Supportive communication may elicit higher trust in provider independent of dysfunction severity and gender, however, likely with a smaller effect than previously assumed, and with no influence on attitudes toward adherence to treatment. Gender differences in perceived attitudes toward treatment adherence appear to be limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.