Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42836063›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in dental medicine2026

Critical analysis of the "nanoleakage concept" in endodontics: a narrative review.

José Luis Álvarez-Vásquez, Daniel Chavarría-Bolaños

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

José Luis Álvarez-VásquezDiscipline of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Cuenca, Cuenca, Ecuador.
Daniel Chavarría-BolañosEndodontics Postgraduate Program, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Microleakage models have historically defined leakage assessment in endodontics despite well-recognized methodological limitations, leading to increasing restrictions on their publication. Since the seminal description of the term nanoleakage, interest in nanoscale interfacial leakage has progressively expanded into endodontics, where achieving a bacteria-free seal is critical for treatment success. Objective: We aim to map and critically analyze the current evidence on nanoleakage in endodontics, identifying research trends, methodological approaches, and existing knowledge gaps across different clinical applications. Methods: A narrative review was conducted following a literature search to identify studies addressing nanoleakage within endodontic contexts. Eligible studies were screened and categorized according to their clinical application and methodological approach. Results: Evidence is derived from Conclusions: Understanding nanoleakage is an important objective, yet endodontic models remain underdeveloped. The existing evidence is limited by methodological inconsistencies and a lack of clinical validation. Future research should prioritize the development of dynamic, clinically relevant models to better understand interfacial sealing and improve the predictability of endodontic outcomes.

Indexed as

biomaterialsdentinendodonticsmicroleakagenanoleakageretrograde fillingroot canal fillingsealing ability

Identifiers

PMID42836063
PMCPMC13637468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.