Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42836045›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

A double-edged impact of AI literacy on consumers' willingness to use AI-powered products: a parallel mediation model of perceived AI risk and perceived social good.

Yuxiang Na, Shiqiang Liu, Xin Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuxiang NaSchool of Journalism and Communication, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Shiqiang LiuSchool of Journalism and Communication, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Xin YanInternational School, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The widespread adoption of artificial intelligence technologies has driven sustained growth in consumer demand for AI-powered products. However, the role of AI literacy as a key determinant of consumers' willingness to use such products remains subject to conflicting conclusions regarding its underlying mechanisms. Methods: This study compared medical and conversational scenarios, constructing a parallel mediation model based on the Value-based Adoption Model. This model featured perceived AI risk and perceived social good as two opposing mediators, exploring the influence mechanism of AI literacy on consumers' willingness to use AI-powered products. Results: Our survey of 441 consumers showed that higher AI literacy significantly increases consumers' willingness to use chat-based AI and medical AI. Perceived social good and perceived AI risk mediated the relationship between AI literacy and willingness to use chat-based AI. The positive mediating effect of perceived social good ( Discussion: This study revealed a dual-path mediation mechanism through which AI literacy influences consumers' willingness to use AI-powered products, as well as its cross-scenario heterogeneity, which not only explained the inconsistent findings in prior research but also provided practical insights for scenario-based deployment of AI-powered products and the cultivation of consumer AI literacy.

Indexed as

AI literacyAI useperceived risksocial goodvalue-based adoption model

Identifiers

PMID42836045
PMCPMC13636432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.