ArticleOncology letters2026
Netupitant-palonosetron combined with dexamethasone for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in high-risk patients with colorectal cancer receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: A retrospective study.
Article in Oncology letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although netupitant-palonosetron (NEPA) is an established option for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy, its efficacy in patients with high-risk features undergoing moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) remains insufficiently investigated. Therefore, the present study evaluated the efficacy of NEPA combined with dexamethasone for preventing CINV in high-risk patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) receiving MEC. This retrospective analysis included 182 patients with CRC receiving MEC who had at least one high-risk factor for CINV, including no alcohol consumption, a history of CINV and female sex. All patients received prophylaxis with a single dose of NEPA combined with dexamethasone. The primary outcome was complete remission (CR), defined as no vomiting and no rescue medication use. Secondary outcomes included complete control (CC), defined as no significant nausea, no vomiting and no rescue medication use, and complete protection (CP), defined as no nausea, no vomiting and no rescue medication use, assessed during the acute (0-24 h), delayed (24-120 h) and overall (0-120 h) phases. Extended efficacy during the 120-168 h period and safety outcomes were also evaluated. The median age was 58.7 years (range: 32-75 years). The most frequent high-risk factors were no alcohol consumption (72.0%, 131/182) and a history of CINV (22.0%, 40/182). CR rates during the acute, delayed and overall phases were 98.9, 95.6 and 94.5%, respectively. CC rates were 98.9, 92.3 and 91.2% in the acute, delayed, and overall phases, respectively, while CP rates were 98.9, 78.0 and 76.3% in the corresponding phases. Although CR rates >95% in the acute and delayed phases and only 1.1% of patients required rescue therapy, the CP rate markedly declined from 98.9% in the acute phase to 78.0% in the delayed phase, indicating that nausea control remains a major clinical challenge during the delayed period despite effective prevention of vomiting. In a subset of 120 patients, the overall CR, CC and CP rates during the 120-168 h post-chemotherapy period remained high at 96.6, 91.6 and 84.2%, respectively. The combination of NEPA and dexamethasone was well tolerated; constipation was the most frequently reported adverse event (11.0%), predominantly grade 1 (9.3%), with no grade 3 or 4 events observed. In this single-arm retrospective study, the combination of NEPA and dexamethasone demonstrated promising efficacy and a favorable safety profile in high-risk patients with CRC receiving MEC, with sustained antiemetic protection beyond 120 h post-chemotherapy. Nevertheless, these findings should be considered preliminary and require confirmation in prospective randomized controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.