ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2026
Risk factors of hypertension in South Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis to inform the development of a clinical prediction model.
Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Hypertension is a major cause of preventable cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and remains a significant public health challenge in South Africa. Most existing risk prediction models were derived from high-income populations and may not perform well in low- and middle-income settings. Aim: To synthesise pooled evidence on risk factors of hypertension in South Africa and use the findings to inform the development of a clinical prediction model. Setting: South Africa. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using studies retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, Academic Search Complete, MEDLINE, Web of Science and African Journals (SABINET) from 1990 to March 2025. Titles, abstracts and full texts were screened independently by two reviewers. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool odds ratios for eligible risk factors. Certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), while predictor selection for model development was guided by risk weight and geotemporal trend. Results: Fifty-four studies, including cross-sectional, case-control and cohort designs, were included. The studies covered multiple South African provinces, with 15 national studies spanning all nine provinces. Strong pooled associations were observed for dyslipidaemia (odds ratio [OR] 3.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.84-7.80), age > 50 years (OR 3.49, 95% CI 1.82-6.70), diabetes (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.86-3.53), obesity (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.89-2.91) and gold mine dust exposure (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.70-3.25). These findings informed the final prediction model. Conclusion: Age, metabolic factors, environmental exposures and selected social determinants were important predictors of hypertension. The resulting model may support early screening in primary care, although external validation is required. Contribution: This study synthesises South African evidence on hypertension risk factors and translates the findings into a context-specific clinical prediction model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.