ArticleHealth SA = SA Gesondheid2026
Experiences of emergency care practitioners on pre-hospital rapid sequence intubation in South Africa.
Article in Health SA = SA Gesondheid, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pre-hospital Rapid Sequence Intubation (RSI) is a complex, high-stakes and time-sensitive procedure performed in unpredictable resource-constrained environments. Successful execution of pre-hospital RSI demands coordinated teamwork, thorough preparation and clear communication. Aim: This qualitative study explored the experiences of Emergency Care Practitioners (ECPs) during pre-hospital RSI. Setting: The study was conducted across three South African provinces: Gauteng, KwaZulu-Natal and the Western Cape. Methods: The study adopted a descriptive qualitative design, using focus group discussions (FGDs) to understand ECPs' experiences during prehospital RSI. Six FGDs were conducted online via Microsoft Teams. All discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed and analysed using qualitative data analysis software, NVivo 13 (2020 R1). Results: A total of 39 ECPs voluntarily participated in six FGDs, representing both public and private sectors. The following themes emerged; system-driven administrative demands and procedural complexity, resource and workforce constraints affecting RSI performance and communication-related challenges and information gaps affecting clinical decision-making. Conclusion: The ECPs voice concerns about challenges that require Emergency Medical Services (EMS) management to implement supportive measures, including improved access to resources and equipment during pre-hospital RSI. Additionally, they argue that practitioner proficiency promotes the effective execution of pre-hospital RSI. Contribution: The findings of this study and the insights gained can guide EMS leadership and policymakers in formulating targeted strategies that will ensure the availability of essential resources and strengthen operational support to enhance the safety and quality of care delivered to critically ill or injured patients requiring RSI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.