ReviewRSC advances2026
A systematic review of structure-activity relationships in bacterial levan: physicochemical mediation and context-dependent functionality.
Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bacterial levan is a β-(2 → 6)-linked fructan with variable β-(2 → 1) branching, molar-mass distribution and higher-order organization. Although these descriptors are frequently associated with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and prebiotic outcomes, the evidential basis for direct structure-activity relationships remains uncertain. We systematically reviewed 26 primary studies identified through Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection using a PRISMA 2020-informed process. Eligibility was separated from post-inclusion appraisal, and studies were classified according to whether they provided direct within-study evidence, indirect triangulated evidence or contextual observations only. Evidence was synthesized separately for chemical antioxidant assays, cell-based inflammatory models, microbial fermentation/prebiotic systems, gastrointestinal-protection models and material-performance tests. Across regimes, molar mass alone did not consistently explain activity, and few studies jointly measured polymer structure, physicochemical state and functional outcome. Diffusion, aggregation, molecular accessibility and interfacial interactions are therefore not treated as established mediators; rather, they form a testable interpretive model consistent with the available indirect evidence. Low-resolution studies were retained to characterize the evidentiary landscape but were excluded from positive mechanistic inference. This review defines the minimum analytical and experimental conditions required to test levan structure-function hypotheses and provides a chemistry-centred framework for future, within-system validation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.