ReviewRegenerative therapy2026
Stem cell senescence as a regenerative bottleneck in age-related skeletal degeneration: Mechanistic crosstalk and translational strategies.
Review in Regenerative therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skeletal degeneration is a major cause of pain, disability, fragility fracture, and loss of independence in aging populations. Although osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, and intervertebral disc degeneration are usually managed as anatomically separate disorders, they share a common regenerative failure: endogenous stem and progenitor cells lose renewal capacity, acquire inflammatory secretory programs, and become less able to rebuild damaged matrix. This narrative review synthesizes evidence on senescence in bone marrow mesenchymal stem/stromal cells, skeletal stem cells, hematopoietic stem cells, cartilage progenitor cells, synovial mesenchymal stromal cells, and disc-derived progenitor populations. Priority is given to primary mechanistic, omics, translational, and early clinical studies that connect senescence markers with functional impairment or intervention response. We discuss telomere-associated DNA damage, mitochondrial and oxidative stress, nutrient- and mechanosensing pathways, epigenetic remodeling, dysregulated autophagy and mitophagy, and the senescence-associated secretory phenotype as interlocking mechanisms that reshape skeletal niches. Disease-specific sections then examine how senescent progenitor compartments drive osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, and intervertebral disc degeneration through impaired osteogenesis or chondrogenesis, matrix catabolism, inflammatory vesicle signaling, and maladaptive mechanical feedback. Finally, we compare senolytics, senomorphics, metabolic and mitochondrial regulators, cell rejuvenation, extracellular vesicle engineering, biomaterials, and gene-based delivery platforms from a regenerative medicine perspective. Stem/progenitor cell senescence should be treated not simply as a biomarker of aging, but as a compartment-specific therapeutic bottleneck. Translation will require rigorous cell identity, multi-parameter senescence assays, disease-stage stratification, and therapies that restore regenerative competence without suppressing physiological repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.