Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42835938›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026

Learning from the kidney: improving heart recovery from hypothermia.

Casey Kraft, John C Bischof, Erik B Finger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Casey KraftDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
John C BischofDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Erik B FingerDepartment of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States.

Funding

Organ banking for transplant—kidney cryopreservation by vitrification and novel nanowarming technologyR01DK117425 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI JOHN C BISCHOF, Erik Brian Finger · 2018 to 2026
$4.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK117425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extending donor organ preservation times would substantially improve patient outcomes by widening safety margins and enabling better donor-to-patient matching. While clinical 4°C static storage typically preserves donor kidneys for 18-24 h, donor hearts are limited to ∼4 h. This clinical disparity is traditionally attributed to the higher baseline metabolic demand of cardiac tissue. This narrative review challenges this conventional assumption by comparing the distinct metabolic profiles of the heart and kidney at both 37°C and 4°C. We propose two mechanisms to explain how kidneys maintain robust functional recovery despite a much steeper decline in ATP concentration during hypothermic storage: (1) a significantly higher ATP consumption rate in hypothermic kidneys compared to hearts, and (2) a lower susceptibility to and degree of cold-induced tissue acidosis in the kidney. Building on these pathways, we outline targeted therapeutic interventions, such as inhibition of the Na

Indexed as

acidosisCPA toxicitycryopreservationhypothermiaischemia reperfusion injury (IRI)metabolismorgan preservationsodium overload

Identifiers

PMID42835938
PMCPMC13636051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.