ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Subclinical pulmonary embolism in first-line/induction therapy of lung cancer - a remaining clinically relevant adverse event.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pulmonary embolism (PE) at initial diagnosis and during first-line systemic treatment is clinically relevant in patients with lung cancer. However, real-world incidence of subclinical PE is not well established. Methods: Retrospective single-center analysis of patients at least 18 years old with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) who received first-line/induction systemic therapy. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the thorax with bolus tracking for PE detection. Treatment response was assessed by restaging at weeks 6 and 12 after treatment initiation. Results: A total of 373 patients treated between 2019 and 2022 were included (261 NSCLC, 112 SCLC; 179 women and 194 men; median age 66 years [range, 22 to 86]; median smoking history 40 Pack Years [range, 0-150]). There was a predominance of locally advanced and metastatic disease (IB-IIB, n = 22; IIIA-C, n = 123; IVA-B, n = 228). Adenocarcinoma was the predominant histology among NSCLC cases (LUAD, n = 146), followed by squamous cell carcinoma and other NSCLC subtypes combined (n = 115); 112 patients had SCLC.PE was detected in 61/373 patients, of whom 58 (95%) had subclinical PE. In NSCLC, body-mass-index (BMI) was independently associated with occurrence of PE (OR = 1.111, p = 0.005), while central tumor localization (OR 5.637, p = 0.028) and vascular infiltration (OR 7.683, p = 0.010) were significantly associated with PE in SCLC. All patients with PE received anticoagulants according to national and international guidelines and no PE-related deaths occurred. Conclusion: This single-center analysis demonstrates a high incidence of subclinical PE in newly diagnosed lung cancer patients and identifies clinical risk factors associated with PE development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.