ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing2026
Cancer risk perception among family members of patients with digestive tract cancer and associated patient- and family member-related factors: A cross-sectional study of 414 patient-family member pairs.
Article in Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Family members of patients with digestive tract cancer may share familial or lifestyle-related risks, but their cancer risk perception is poorly understood. This study assessed cancer risk perception and associated patient- and family member-related factors. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 414 patient-family member pairs (828 individuals) from two tertiary hospitals in Sichuan Province, China, between March and October 2023. Cancer risk perception was assessed using a modified 26-item scale. Associated factors were examined using Results: The mean total score among family members was 89.23 (standard deviation [SD] 22.42). Mean item scores were 3.41 (SD 0.99) for deliberative, 3.89 (SD 1.49) for affective, 3.76 (SD 1.03) for experiential, and 2.86 (SD 0.77) for carcinogenic factor risk perception. In the final model, patient treatment complications and mild self-care dependence were associated with higher scores. Among family members, higher scores were associated with junior college or higher education, monthly per capita family income greater than 5000 Chinese yuan (CNY), and previous care of another relative with cancer; lower scores were associated with older age (45-59 and ≥ 60 years), good self-rated health, and improved health status. The model explained 60.5% of the variance (adjusted Conclusions: Cancer risk perception was associated with patient clinical circumstances and family member demographic, caregiving, and health characteristics. The carcinogenic factor dimension had the lowest mean item score. These findings support appropriately calibrated risk communication and guideline-based prevention counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.