Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42835865›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2026

Moral distress, resilience and human spirituality in the veterinary clinic.

Emil Børty Nielsen, Eva Maria Meier Carlsen, Maja Louise Arendt, Per Torp Sangild

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emil Børty NielsenCentre for Science and Faith, Faculty of Theology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eva Maria Meier CarlsenCentre for Science and Faith, Faculty of Theology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Maja Louise ArendtDepartment of Clinical Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Per Torp SangildCentre for Science and Faith, Faculty of Theology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spiritual health of veterinarians is challenged by moral distress that expresses a conflict between personal core values and clinical practice. The morally resilient veterinarian experiences and addresses moral distress in constructive ways that express care for patients, owners, colleagues and society. As such, moral resilience is a positive aspect of spiritual health that can be built through reflections and dialogue on the ethical, existential, spiritual and religious questions raised by veterinary practice. Veterinarians often face complex moral dilemmas when attempting to balance the interests of animal patients, their owners, the veterinary business, surrounding society, and themselves. When it is not possible to accommodate all these responsibilities, moral distress may occur, a state associated with compassion fatigue, burnout and depression. Human spirituality concerns a person's central relationships with the self, others, nature, animals and "the sacred" giving meaning, purpose and values to life. Consequently, moral distress affects not only physical, social and mental health, but also spiritual-existential health and well-being, as it disrupts these core relationships in a way that defies simple technical and practical solutions. We argue that strategies to increase moral resilience (and thus spiritual health) should include conversations with peers and mentors aiming to articulate experiences of moral distress and reinterpret their meaning. Since moral distress in a veterinary clinic involves emotions, values and ideas about the human-animal relationship, resilience-building reflections and conversations must address existential themes like personal responsibility, guilt, acceptance, forgiveness and moral agency. These questions cannot be answered by scientific knowledge alone, but involve personal faith perspectives (secular-existential, spiritual or religious). Consequently, veterinarians, both individually and collectively, should increase attention to the broader existential context of clinical work in order to cultivate moral resilience and enhance spiritual health.

Indexed as

animal euthanasiaexistential healthholistic healthmoral dilemmasmoral distressmoral resiliencescience and faithspiritual health

Identifiers

PMID42835865
PMCPMC13635879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.