ArticleFrontiers in genetics2026
Missingness-aware machine learning using routine laboratory data for distinguishing hepatitis from cirrhosis.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Early identification of cirrhosis among patients with hepatitis is important for timely risk stratification and clinical management, yet conventional non-invasive scores such as the fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) and the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) may provide limited discrimination. In clinical datasets, missingness patterns may also carry predictive information, but their value for cirrhosis identification remains insufficiently investigated. Methods: We included 672 individuals, comprising 334 patients with hepatitis and 338 patients with cirrhosis, and randomly divided them into training and testing sets at in 8:2 ratio. FIB-4, APRI and multiple machine-learning models were developed using routinely available laboratory parameters; missing values were handled by median imputation, and binary missingness indicators were incorporated into selected models. Results: Machine-learning models showed better discriminatory performance than conventional scores. The Extra Trees model incorporating missingness indicators (ET + indicator) achieved the highest AUC (0.841), whereas the support vector machine model incorporating missingness indicators (SVM + indicator) achieved the highest AUPRC (0.813). By contrast, FIB-4 and APRI had AUC values of 0.537 and 0.519, respectively. Incorporating missingness indicators further improved the performance of ET, SVM and HGB models, and reducing the ET + indicator threshold from 0.50 to 0.42 increased sensitivity from 0.765 to 0.882. Discussion: Missingness-aware machine-learning models based on routine laboratory parameters may improve hepatitis-to-cirrhosis discrimination and support risk stratification in real-world screening settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.