ArticleSmall science2026
Particle Size Measurement of Organic Nanocarriers: A Case Study Using Polyacrylate-Based Polymer Nanocarriers.
Article in Small science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates the sensitivity, detection limits, and applicability of size measurement techniques to polyacrylate-based polymer nanocarriers (PNCs) in a hydrated state. Dynamic light scattering (DLS), particle tracking analysis (PTA), cryo-transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and differential centrifugal sedimentation (DCS) are applied to commercial and laboratory-scale PNCs to assess the effect of UV-mediated crosslinking, as well as the impact of active substances (ASs) and commercial dispersants on size distribution. Polydispersity and low refractive index make DLS unreliable. PTA does not detect PNCs <50 nm and requires adapting concentrations to each PNC, challenging comparisons. DCS captures polydispersity but could not detect PNCs <50 nm either. Importantly, DLS, PTA, and DCS assume spherical geometry, but commercial PNCs are unlikely to be spherical, thus seriously challenging data interpretation. Cryo-TEM detects PNCs <50 nm and delivers the most reliable size distribution. Large differences among the PNCs tested warn against the use of model PNCs and read across when conducting risk assessment. Our results confirm the challenges and inadequacies in existing approaches and call for more research to develop multimethod approaches and adaptation of OECD guidelines to characterize PNCs, which are increasingly used across various sectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.