ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
Does getting online help low-income adults eat better? Digital access and BMI-based nutritional imbalance in China.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The digital economy has reshaped how people work, shop, and manage health, yet uneven nutrition remains a pressing livelihood concern for low-income groups in China now that absolute poverty has ended. Most of what is known about improving nutrition in these households has to do with money, whether cash transfers or food subsidies, and much less is known about what changes when a household simply gets online. This study asks whether being connected goes together with a lower risk of nutritional imbalance among low-income adults, and what may lie behind that link. Methods: Nutritional imbalance here covers both sides of the problem, being too thin and being too heavy, since low-income households in China face the two at once. It is built from body mass index and coded as six ordered categories, with a higher value standing for a more serious departure from a healthy weight. We draw on five waves of the China Family Panel Studies covering 2014 to 2022 and focus on adults aged 18 to 69 whose household per capita income falls in the bottom fifth within their province, which leaves 12,076 observations. The estimates compare the same person across waves, setting aside what is fixed about an individual and what moves for everyone at once. Three possible routes are then examined in turn, namely the weight of food in the household budget, labor income, and exercise frequency. Results: Low-income adults who are online carry a lower risk of nutritional imbalance, and the finding holds when the income line is drawn differently, when connectivity is counted differently, and when the model is changed. Being online goes together most clearly with more regular exercise, and it also goes together with a slightly larger share of the household budget spent on food and with higher earnings among those who work. The link is strongest for rural residents, for adults aged 50 and over, and for those who left school at or before the end of lower secondary education, while among urban, younger, and better educated adults no clear link shows up. Discussion: Connectivity seems to supplement offline provision rather than replace it, since little shows up where offline services are already dense. Expanding rural digital infrastructure and pairing online with offline nutrition support may therefore help narrow the nutrition gap that runs alongside the digital divide. The findings are reported throughout as associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.