Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42835827›Full record

ReviewArab journal of urology2026

Hem-o-Lok® clip migration after robotic prostatectomy: PRISMA-guided review with two illustrative cases.

C P Leiberman, X W J Lee, T Amer, S K Nalagatla

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Arab journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

C P LeibermanDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Monklands, Airdrie, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9109-2462
X W J LeeDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Monklands, Airdrie, UK.
T AmerDepartment of Urology, Victoria Hospital, Fife, UK.
S K NalagatlaDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Monklands, Airdrie, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hem-o-Lok® polymer clips are widely used during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Although generally safe, delayed intravesical migration is an under-recognized source of lower urinary tract symptoms, haematuria and bladder stone formation. We report two illustrative cases - one with large bladder calculus formed around an eroded clip and another with spontaneous urethral passage - then synthesize the contemporary literature using a PRISMA-guided search. Across > 100 reported patients, time to presentation ranges from 1 to 252 months. The commonest presentations are LUTS, haematuria and recurrent infection; most cases are diagnosed by cystoscopy (often with confirmatory CT) and managed endoscopically with clip extraction ± laser lithotripsy, with open removal reserved for inaccessible or embedded clips. Proposed mechanisms include clip placement close to the vesicourethral anastomosis, devitalized tissue at the anastomosis, urine leak and radiotherapy-related impaired healing. Preventive strategies center on minimizing clip use near the anastomosis, meticulous retrieval of loose clips, judicious energy use at the apex/bladder neck, and considering alternatives (suture ligation or vessel-sealing devices) where appropriate. Increased awareness can shorten time to diagnosis and reduce morbidity for post-prostatectomy patients presenting with non-specific urinary symptoms years after surgery.

Indexed as

bladder stoneHem-o-Lok migrationlower urinary tract symptomsrobotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy

Identifiers

PMID42835827
PMCPMC13637765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.