ReviewArab journal of urology2026
Hem-o-Lok® clip migration after robotic prostatectomy: PRISMA-guided review with two illustrative cases.
Review in Arab journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hem-o-Lok® polymer clips are widely used during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Although generally safe, delayed intravesical migration is an under-recognized source of lower urinary tract symptoms, haematuria and bladder stone formation. We report two illustrative cases - one with large bladder calculus formed around an eroded clip and another with spontaneous urethral passage - then synthesize the contemporary literature using a PRISMA-guided search. Across > 100 reported patients, time to presentation ranges from 1 to 252 months. The commonest presentations are LUTS, haematuria and recurrent infection; most cases are diagnosed by cystoscopy (often with confirmatory CT) and managed endoscopically with clip extraction ± laser lithotripsy, with open removal reserved for inaccessible or embedded clips. Proposed mechanisms include clip placement close to the vesicourethral anastomosis, devitalized tissue at the anastomosis, urine leak and radiotherapy-related impaired healing. Preventive strategies center on minimizing clip use near the anastomosis, meticulous retrieval of loose clips, judicious energy use at the apex/bladder neck, and considering alternatives (suture ligation or vessel-sealing devices) where appropriate. Increased awareness can shorten time to diagnosis and reduce morbidity for post-prostatectomy patients presenting with non-specific urinary symptoms years after surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.