ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2026
Layer-Specific Assessment of Dermal Thickness and Stiffness Using Shear Wave Elastography in Gynecologic Cancer-Related Lower-Limb Lymphedema: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To characterize layer-specific changes in superficial tissues using shear wave elastography (SWE) in women with gynecologic cancer-related lower-limb lymphedema, including clinically asymptomatic contralateral limbs and affected limbs with different clinical severity levels. Methods: This exploratory observational cross-sectional study employed a mixed retrospective-prospective design. Forty women with gynecologic cancer-related lower-limb lymphedema and 20 healthy controls underwent grayscale ultrasound and SWE examinations. Dermal and subcutaneous thickness and stiffness were measured at three standardized medial sites: the upper calf, mid-calf, and medial ankle. For unilateral lymphedema, SWE-derived tissue parameters of clinically asymptomatic contralateral limbs were compared with those of healthy controls after adjustment for age and body mass index (BMI). To evaluate differences across clinical severity groups, affected limbs were categorized into mild and severe lymphedema groups, and overall differences among healthy controls, mild lymphedema, and severe lymphedema groups were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis omnibus test, followed by Dunn's post hoc analysis for pairwise comparisons. Spearman correlation analysis was performed to assess associations between clinical characteristics and SWE-derived parameters. Interobserver reproducibility was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients. Results: Clinically asymptomatic contralateral limbs demonstrated higher dermal thickness and stiffness values compared with healthy controls, whereas subcutaneous alterations were less consistent. Across healthy controls, mild lymphedema, and severe lymphedema groups, omnibus analysis revealed significant differences in dermal thickness, dermal stiffness, and subcutaneous thickness, while subcutaneous stiffness showed no significant differences. Both mild and severe lymphedema groups exhibited greater dermal thickness, dermal stiffness, and subcutaneous thickness than healthy controls at all assessed sites; however, differences between mild and severe lymphedema groups were limited. Lymphedema severity stage, disease duration, and BMI were positively associated with multiple SWE-derived parameters. SWE measurements demonstrated excellent interobserver reproducibility. Conclusion: SWE demonstrated layer-specific differences in dermal thickness and stiffness across clinically defined groups of gynecologic cancer-related lower-limb lymphedema. Clinically asymptomatic contralateral limbs showed measurable dermal differences compared with healthy controls; however, the clinical significance of these findings requires further evaluation in prospective longitudinal studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.