ArticleHealth science reports2026
The Use of Cupping (Hijama) Therapy Among Athletes and Its Relationship With Sleep Quality: A Cross-Sectional Study in Palestine.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Wet cupping, or Hijama, is commonly used by athletes for recovery, yet evidence regarding its relationship with sleep quality remains limited. This study examined cupping use, perceived benefits, adverse effects, and factors associated with self-reported sleep quality among Palestinian athletes. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among Palestinian athletes. Of 754 athletes screened at nine sports clubs and training centers across the West Bank, 470 (62.3%) reported previous wet-cupping use; 468 had sufficient primary-outcome data and were analyzed. Data were collected using a structured paper-based questionnaire incorporating the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Analyses included descriptive statistics, exact and chi-square tests, Spearman correlations, multiple linear regression, and path analysis. Results: Improved mobility (30.8%), reduced muscle cramps (25.6%), enhanced immunity (16.2%), and increased endurance (9.0%) were the most frequently reported intended benefits. Cupping was commonly reported for chronic or recurrent conditions (99.6%), muscle strain (41.5%), and headaches (41.2%). Higher BMI and greater cupping-session frequency were associated with greater perceived cupping benefit ( Conclusion: Cupping-related practices and participant characteristics were associated with sleep quality. More frequent sessions, vitamin use, manual suction, higher BMI, and greater perceived benefit were associated with better sleep quality. These findings do not establish causality. Prospective studies are needed before cupping can be recommended to improve sleep or recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.