Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42835785›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2026

Assessment of pleural effusion using intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasound: a pilot study.

Dachuan Tang, Dan Wang, Zhongyu Li, Bohan Lu, Huiming Yi, Wei Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dachuan Tang *Department of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Dan Wang *Department of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Zhongyu LiDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Bohan LuDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Huiming YiDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Wei ZhangDepartment of Medical Ultrasound, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To address the limitations of current imaging modalities, the present study aimed to develop and validate a novel intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) approach for the quantitative assessment of pleural effusion (PE) volume and differentiation of exudative PE from transudative PE. Methods: This cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study prospectively enrolled 100 patients with PE undergoing US-guided thoracentesis. Intracavitary CEUS was performed using SonoVue microbubbles, and time-intensity curve parameters (A, B, and A+B) were analyzed. PE volume was measured based on the drainage volume, and effusions were classified as exudates or transudates according to Light's criteria. Diagnostic performance was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and a linear regression model was developed to predict PE volume. Results: Exudative PE showed significantly higher baseline intensity parameter B (-35.18 ± 5.17 Conclusion: Intracavitary CEUS could serve as a reliable, minimally invasive, feasible radiation-free adjunctive technique for quantifying PE volume and differentiating exudative versus transudative PE in patients undergoing thoracentesis. The A+B-based regression model provides high predictive accuracy, while A and B values facilitate effusion classification. This quantitative CEUS workflow may facilitate clinical decision-making, and its utility for serial monitoring requires further verification in large-scale real-world cohorts.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaPleural EffusionAgedCross-Sectional StudiesExudates and TransudatesFemaleHumansMaleMicrobubblesMiddle AgedPhospholipidsPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesROC CurveSulfur HexafluorideThoracentesiscontrast agent BR1Contrast MediaPhospholipidsSulfur HexafluorideExudative pleural effusionIntracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasoundPleural effusionPleural effusion volume quantificationTime-intensity curve quantitative analysisTransudative pleural effusion

Identifiers

PMID42835785
PMCPMC13637638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.