ArticleClinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology2026
High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound for the Treatment of Infraorbital Fat Protrusion: A Preliminary Case Series.
Article in Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infraorbital fat (IOF) protrusion is a common feature of periorbital aging and is commonly managed with lower blepharoplasty. Although surgical approaches can provide predictable aesthetic outcomes, there remains interest in minimally invasive treatment options for appropriately selected patients. This preliminary case series evaluated the feasibility, short-term tolerability, and clinical outcomes of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for the treatment of IOF protrusion. Three Korean patients (two female and one male; mean age, 48 years) underwent HIFU treatment using LinearZ device at focal depths of 4.5 and 9.0 mm following pre-treatment ultrasonography. Each treatment session delivered 0.6 J per shot in DOT mode under local anesthesia. Clinical photographs, patient satisfaction, and Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) scores were assessed three months after the final treatment session. All three patients showed clinically observable improvement in infraorbital bulging and lid-cheek contour, with high patient satisfaction. GAIS scores were 4, 5, and 4, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated, with transient erythema and edema reported and no major adverse events observed during follow-up. Given the very small sample size, absence of a control group, subjective and non-blinded outcome assessment, lack of systematic post-treatment imaging or quantitative fat measurements, and short follow-up, these findings should be considered preliminary and hypothesis-generating. Larger controlled studies incorporating objective outcome measures are warranted to establish efficacy, durability, and optimal treatment parameters of HIFU for IOF protrusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.