Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42835735›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2026

A Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model for Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis.

Guoquan Sun, Ling Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Guoquan SunDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou, 310005, People's Republic of China.
Ling LiuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Hangzhou, 310005, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) is a severe endometriosis phenotype. This study aimed to develop and internally validate a machine learning-based predictive model for DIE using retrospective clinical data from a single center to improve diagnostic accuracy. Materials and Methods: Clinical, imaging, and laboratory data were retrospectively collected from 250 surgically confirmed DIE patients and non-DIE endometriosis controls (2020-2025). Samples were randomly split 7:3 into training and internal validation sets. Three machine learning algorithms-Random Forest (RF), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), and Support Vector Machine (SVM)-were developed and compared with conventional logistic regression. Model performance was assessed using AUC, sensitivity, specificity, calibration, and decision curves. The model was designed to identify DIE among patients with confirmed or suspected endometriosis. Results: Univariate analysis identified seven independent predictors (age, BMI, CA125, CA199, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, albumin, ovarian endometrioma), confirmed by multivariate logistic regression. In the validation set, AUCs were 0.787 (RF), 0.740 (GBM), 0.685 (SVM), and 0.709 (logistic regression). RF achieved 0.714 accuracy and 0.821 specificity, alongside favorable calibration and a positive net clinical benefit. Conclusion: In this retrospective single-center exploratory study, the RF model demonstrated moderate non-invasive predictive performance for DIE. However, this performance level does not yet support clinical readiness, and external multicenter validation is needed to confirm generalizability.

Indexed as

deep infiltrating endometriosisinternal validationmachine learningpredictive model

Identifiers

PMID42835735
PMCPMC13637508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.