ArticleJournal of pain research2026
Efficacy of Electroacupuncture for Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial.
Article in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture in the management of chronic pelvic pain (CPP). Methods: This randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled trial enrolled 66 women aged 18 to 50 years with CPP. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either electroacupuncture or sham electroacupuncture. Each treatment session lasted 30 minutes and was administered three times weekly, with treatment suspended during menstruation and subsequently resumed until 24 sessions were completed. The primary outcomes were lower abdominal pain and lumbosacral pain assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at baseline, week 8 (end of treatment), and week 16 (8-week follow-up). Secondary outcomes were depression and anxiety assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale HAMD) and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA) before and after treatment. Results: Sixty-six women were randomized, with 32 assigned to electroacupuncture and 34 to sham electroacupuncture. At week 8, the reported between-group effect estimates were 3.37 (95% CI, 2.62-4.12) for lower abdominal pain and 3.14 (95% CI, 2.42-3.87) for lumbosacral pain (both Conclusion: Electroacupuncture may reduce lower abdominal and lumbosacral pain in women with CPP, and the observed reduction was maintained through the 8-week follow-up period. No specific between-group benefit was demonstrated for anxiety or depressive symptoms. Larger studies with longer follow-up are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.