ArticleResuscitation plus2026
Low-dose, high-frequency simulation with respiratory function monitor feedback enhances face mask ventilation across neonatal resuscitation devices: A prospective study in neonatology fellows.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Face mask ventilation (FMV) is a critical skill in neonatal resuscitation, yet structured assessment of neonatology fellow competence has remained limited. This study evaluated whether low-dose, high-frequency simulation with real-time respiratory function monitor (RFM) feedback improved FMV performance across commonly used ventilation devices. A prospective, single-center study was conducted over nine months involving neonatology fellows who performed simulated FMV using a T-piece resuscitator, self-inflating bag, and flow-inflating bag. Each session included blinded and unblinded RFM conditions. Primary outcomes included tidal volume (TV) within target range, mask leak, peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), respiratory rate, and self-reported proficiency. Mixed-effects models accounted for repeated measures. TV within goal range was higher with RFM feedback (80.3% vs 62.3%,
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.