ReviewMolecular therapy. Advances2026
Clinical immunogenicity in rAAV gene therapy: Insights and implications.
Review in Molecular therapy. Advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recombinant adeno-associated viruses (rAAV) provide prolonged therapeutic protein expression in multiple target organs after single administration, delivering significant clinical benefits with a well-characterized safety profile, and can be further supported by active immune management strategies. Systemic rAAV gene therapy is associated primarily with transient hepatocellular injury, while complement-mediated thrombotic microangiopathy and immune-related cardiac events occur in specific contexts; DRG-associated neurotoxicity remains predominantly nonclinical with only isolated suspected human cases. The extent, kinetics, and clinical consequences of immune activation are influenced by vector-related factors, dose, route of administration, and patient-specific characteristics. Hence, the immune responses may vary significantly across products, treatment regimens, and patient populations. These responses depend on disease indication, dosing and immunosuppression regimens, route of administration, vector serotypes, and underlying immune status. Significant progress has been made in understanding mechanistic and clinical aspects of rAAV immunogenicity. Strategies for clinically managing immunogenicity are being developed to achieve desired efficacy, minimize immune-mediated adverse events, and potentially expand treatment options for patients with or without previous AAV exposure. This review focuses on clinical manifestations of immune responses to rAAV, temporal patterns of these safety events and underlying immunological mechanisms, and discusses clinical considerations, risk assessment, and potential emerging immunogenicity mitigation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.