ArticleSA journal of radiology2026
Unusual presentations of meningiomas: A case series.
Article in SA journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Meningiomas, the most common primary intracranial tumours (accounting for 36% of central nervous system neoplasms), typically present as well-circumscribed, extra-axial masses with homogeneous enhancement, dural tails and hyperostosis on imaging. However, 15% show atypical features that can mimic gliomas, metastases or abscesses, posing diagnostic challenges. This case series present seven histologically confirmed meningiomas illustrating atypical imaging appearances, identified retrospectively from the institutional teaching archive. The cases include intraventricular, septated cystic, perineural spread, circumscribed low T2 or FLAIR signal, frond-like low T2 or FLAIR signal, peritumoural cystic and radiation-induced meningiomas. All were WHO grade 1, except one radiation-induced grade 2 tumour. Key atypical imaging findings included heterogeneous enhancement, non-suppressing cystic components on FLAIR, brain invasion, absent dural tail and perilesional oedema. Although these features suggested higher-grade behaviour, they did not correlate with the final histological grade. Atypical imaging features in meningiomas may closely mimic more aggressive pathologies and do not reliably predict histological grade. Recognition of these variants is essential for accurate diagnosis and appropriate management. Contribution: This case series expands the recognised imaging spectrum of meningiomas by demonstrating diverse atypical appearances that closely mimic other intracranial pathologies. Importantly, it highlights the discordance between aggressive imaging features and histological grade, reinforcing that atypical morphology should not be equated with higher-grade disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.