ArticleJournal of the colleges of medicine of South Africa2026
Palliative care needs at a South African district hospital: A descriptive study using supportive and palliative care indicators tool South Africa.
Article in Journal of the colleges of medicine of South Africa, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with advanced life-limiting diseases (ALLDs) are often admitted to district hospitals for acute curative care, resulting in delayed or omitted palliative care. Early identification by clinicians ensured better care, efficient resource use and prevented avoidable hospitalisations. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and profile of admitted adult patients with palliative care needs at National District Hospital (NDH). Methods: This was a retrospective descriptive study. Investigators identified palliative care needs based on the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool South Africa (Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool [SPICT]™-SA) criteria. Results: Out of 297 patient records reviewed, 127 (42.8%) met the criteria for palliative care based on SPICT™-SA. The most common qualifying disease-specific diagnoses included infectious diseases (21.8%), neurological conditions (15.6%), dementia or frailty (13.6%), and kidney disease (15.0%), while cancer (including haematological malignancies) accounted for 10.9%. The general indicators qualifying for palliative care included frequent unplanned visits (39.3%), poor functional status (26.2%) and dependence on others for care (24.3%). Conclusion: The findings pointed to a gap in recognising palliative care needs among hospitalised patients, especially those with non-malignant conditions. Introducing routine screening using the SPICT™-SA tool at the district level supported earlier identification and enabled planning of care. This led to improved patient outcomes and effective use of health system resources. Contribution: The study demonstrated how routine screening with the SPICT™-SA tool during admission could help identify palliative care needs in a district hospital.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.