Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42835612›Full record

ReviewClinical and translational radiation oncology2027

Reirradiation of recurrent brain tumors: a review by the ESTRO CNS Focus Group.

Raffaella De Pietro, Elena Clerici, Maciej Harat, Karthica Indramohan, Tomas Kazda, Slavka Lukacova, Andrada Turcas, Giuseppe Minniti, Maximilian Niyazi, Felix Ehret

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Raffaella De PietroThe European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium.
Elena ClericiRadiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Maciej HaratDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Franciszek Lukaszczyk Oncology Center and Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Science and Technology, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Karthica IndramohanRadiotherapy and Proton Beam Therapy Department, University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Tomas KazdaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute and Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Slavka LukacovaDepartment of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Andrada TurcasInstitute of Advanced Studies in Science and Technology, Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Giuseppe MinnitiDepartment of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli (IS), Italy.
Maximilian NiyaziDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Felix EhretCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Reirradiation has become an area of increasing clinical and scientific interest, particularly in neuro-oncology. This non-systematic review on central nervous system (CNS) tumors by the CNS focus group of the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology provides a pragmatic synthesis of the available evidence, excluding gliomas. We address key questions related to patient selection, fractionation, technical considerations, and treatment safety. Methods: Relevant studies on the use of reirradiation for meningiomas, ependymomas, brain metastases, and pituitary neuroendocrine tumors, as well as on the management of radiation necrosis, have been reviewed and summarized. Results: Reirradiation has been used with varying success in primary and secondary brain tumors. The appropriate use of reirradiation requires consideration of numerous factors, including, but not limited to, prior treatment courses, fractionation, dose to organs at risk, imaging findings, the volume of the recurrent tumor, and the interval since prior treatments. The vast majority of available studies are limited by their retrospective design, lack of standardization in reporting, and overall heterogeneity across cohorts and treatments. Conclusion: Several reirradiation studies across different tumor entities suggest potential efficacy and safety in carefully selected patients. However, important limitations remain, underscoring the need for well-designed prospective studies with rigorous reporting in both primary and secondary brain tumors.

Indexed as

Brain metastasisBrain tumorsEpendymomaMeningiomaPitNETPituitary neuroendocrine tumorsRadiation therapyRadiotherapyRe-irradiationReirradiation

Identifiers

PMID42835612
PMCPMC13635515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.