ArticleBioengineering & translational medicine2026
Adaptive feedback control for the high-precision management of in-tissue drug concentrations.
Article in Bioengineering & translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The recent availability of a technology providing real-time, seconds-resolved in vivo drug concentration measurements has opened the door to performing fully autonomous, closed-loop feedback control over drug dosing. The controllers employed in prior demonstrations of such dosing, however, were designed and optimized using population-based pharmacokinetic models. In the face of individual pharmacokinetic variation (between subjects or even within a single subject over time as their physiology varies), these controllers must be set rather conservatively so as to avoid potentially dangerous overshooting. This, however, slows the speed with which they achieve the desired set point and opening the possibility of their nevertheless still overshooting if the response of a subject differs too much from that of the "average" subject. To address these issues, here we have developed an adaptive feedback-control system that, rather than employing population-pharmacokinetic information, instead uses real-time drug concentration measurements to individualize drug delivery to the specific subject, "on the fly." To achieve this, the system estimates the pharmacokinetics of the individual subject during the initial stages of the infusion, and then continuously updates this subject-specific pharmacokinetic model to maintain effective controller performance even in the face of physiological variations brought on, for example, by changing health status. Using this approach, we then demonstrate a feedback controller that rapidly (20-30 min) achieves and accurately (5%-12% root-mean-squared deviations, though this also includes sensor noise) maintains pre-defined concentrations of the anesthetic procaine in the ventricles of live rats, an application that, due to the delays associated with intracranial drug transport, represents a particular challenge for feedback-controlled intravenous drug delivery. Given the precision and accuracy it achieves in our rat animal model, we believe that the use of adaptive feedback control will ultimately enable safer, more precise drug dosing in humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.