ArticleGeoHealth2026
Childhood Lead-Exposure Prevention Through Predictive Mapping of At-Risk Housing Nationwide: A Free, Public-Data Screening Map Checked Against Measured Blood Lead in 11 States.
Article in GeoHealth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Childhood lead exposure causes irreversible neurodevelopmental harm, and no safe blood lead level in children has been identified. Measured childhood blood lead is collected unevenly across the United States, and many areas publish no neighborhood-level surveillance, so the children at highest risk are often the hardest to find by measurement. Building on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency finding that housing age and poverty predict where childhood lead exposure concentrates, we computed a lead-exposure risk score for all 83,388 U.S. census tracts and 3,222 counties from public American Community Survey housing-age and poverty data, and tested it against measured childhood blood lead in 11 states by Spearman rank correlation. On surveillance the source study never used, predicted risk tracked measured elevated blood lead at rho = 0.64 across Wisconsin's 1,308 census tracts, with five independent county-scale states ranging from 0.48 to 0.77 and three further independent tract states (Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Minnesota) agreeing. A flexible model on the same public inputs explains only about half the tract-level variance, so housing age and poverty leave most of the variation unexplained, and the map is a screening signal rather than a diagnosis. Every validation state is an older-housing Northeast, Midwest, or Great Plains jurisdiction, so the low-risk predictions for the newer-built West and Sun Belt remain an untested extrapolation. Reproducible from public data and free to use, the map ranks where confirmatory testing should go first, including in states that publish no surveillance of their own.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.