Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42835551›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2026

Effects of Plucking Standards and Processing Methods on the Quality Characteristics of Summer Tea Leaves.

Jinlong Luo, Siyu Liao, Fengjiao Ding, Yuqiao Dai, Zhongying Liu, Tuo Zhang, Ting Yang, Qin Li, Shimao Fang, Yan Li and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jinlong LuoGuizhou Tea Research Institute, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences Guiyang Guizhou China.
Siyu LiaoWuzhi-Xieying Tea Co., Ltd Wuzhishan China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7130-7219
Fengjiao DingGuizhou Tea Research Institute, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences Guiyang Guizhou China.
Yuqiao DaiGuizhou Tea Research Institute, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences Guiyang Guizhou China.
Zhongying LiuGuizhou Tea Research Institute, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences Guiyang Guizhou China.
Tuo ZhangGuizhou Tea Research Institute, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences Guiyang Guizhou China.
Ting YangGuizhou Tea Research Institute, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences Guiyang Guizhou China.
Qin LiGuizhou Tea Research Institute, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences Guiyang Guizhou China.
Shimao FangGuizhou Tea Research Institute, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences Guiyang Guizhou China.
Yan LiGuizhou Tea Research Institute, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences Guiyang Guizhou China.
Wanping FangCollege of Horticulture Nanjing Agricultural University Nanjing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3325-1300
Qiang ShenGuizhou Tea Research Institute, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences Guiyang Guizhou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9856-5679

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To improve the utilization value of summer tea resources, fresh summer tea leaves with different plucking standards were processed into four tea types (green, yellow, white, and black teas) to elucidate the effects of plucking maturity and processing methods on tea quality. Sensory evaluation, physicochemical analysis, electronic tongue, and metabolomics were employed to comprehensively characterize tea quality attributes. The tea samples made from one bud and one leaf showed superior sensory quality, especially in aroma, freshness, and sweetness. Processing significantly shaped flavor profiles: black tea reduced bitterness, white and yellow tea enhanced sweetness and umami, and green tea exhibited stronger umami and astringency characteristics. White and black tea processing also promoted key metabolite accumulation. Based on TAV (taste activity value) and rOAV (relative odor activity value), 10 key taste compounds (e.g., Asp, Glu, Thea, EGCG) and 10 key volatile metabolites (e.g., geraniol and dihydro-2-methyl-3(2H)-furanone) were identified, providing insights into the chemical mechanisms underlying tea quality development. The differential accumulation of taste compounds influenced taste characteristics, while variations in volatile metabolitescontributed to aroma diversity induced by different processing methods.

Indexed as

metabolomicsplucking standardsprocessing methodssummer teasynergism effects

Identifiers

PMID42835551
PMCPMC13635480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.