Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42835528›Full record

ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2026

Outcomes of Screening Colonoscopy in Older Adults: A Large Propensity-Matched Real-World Cohort Study.

Taha Shakarchi, Muneeb Khawar, Mohammad Azeem Malik, Anuhya Jamandlamudi, Ihsan Noushad Karuppan Veettil, Aqsa Komel, Mirza Muhammad Hadeed Khawar, Naima Agha, Muhammad Habib, Ishtiaq Ahmad and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Taha ShakarchiLahey Hospital and Medical Center Burlington Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6583-5362
Muneeb KhawarKing Edward Medical University Lahore Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7051-7413
Mohammad Azeem MalikKing Edward Medical University Lahore Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4829-8611
Anuhya JamandlamudiGuntur Medical College Guntur Andhra Pradesh India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9805-3306
Ihsan Noushad Karuppan VeettilSree Narayana Institute of Medical Sciences Ernakulam Kerala India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4202-3006
Aqsa KomelMayo Clinic Rochester Minnesota USA.
Mirza Muhammad Hadeed KhawarServices Institute of Medical Sciences Lahore Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4048-0316
Naima AghaFoundation University Medical College Rawalpindi Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6398-8378
Muhammad HabibKing Edward Medical University Lahore Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8916-2031
Ishtiaq AhmadUniversity of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics Iowa City Iowa USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8514-1884
Ban Al-AbayechiLahey Hospital and Medical Center Burlington Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2468-3412
Ahmed Al-KhazrajiRutgers New Jersey Medical School Newark New Jersey USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5428-9848

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The benefits and harms of screening colonoscopy after age 75 remain uncertain. Guidelines endorse individualized decisions given competing risks, but comparative data are limited. Methods: In the TriNetX US Collaborative Network, adults aged 75-90 years with a colorectal cancer screening encounter were matched 1:1 by colonoscopy within 3 months. Outcomes were assessed at 30 days, 1 year, and 5 years. Sensitivity analyses excluded pre-index anemia and, separately, fecal abnormalities and alarm symptoms; subsequent colonoscopy was counted through 5 years. Results: Matched cohorts comprised 58 315 pairs at 30 days, 61 497 at 1 year, and 69 821 at 5 years. Colonoscopy increased polyp detection (HR 4.43 [95% CI 4.15-4.73] at 30 days; 1.88 [1.82-1.95] at 5 years) and colorectal cancer detection (4.56 [3.62-5.74]; 1.78 [1.59-1.98]; all Conclusion: Screening colonoscopy improved polyp and cancer detection but did not reduce 5-year all-cause mortality. The late perforation signal was not explained by more subsequent or therapeutic colonoscopy. Decisions after age 75 should be individualized.

Indexed as

colonoscopycolorectal cancer screeningmortalityolder adultsperforationpropensity score matchingreal‐world evidenceTriNetX

Identifiers

PMID42835528
PMCPMC13635485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.