Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42835446›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Constructing intimacy in algorithm mediated online dating: experiences of Chinese young adults.

Wenqi Ji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Wenqi JiSoutheast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Online matchmaking has become an increasingly common way for young people to establish intimate relationships in the digital age. Rather than serving as neutral communication tools, online matchmaking platforms actively shape mate selection, emotional interaction, and relationship development through algorithmic recommendation systems. Although research on algorithmic governance has expanded rapidly, limited attention has been paid to how algorithmic logic shapes intimate relationship construction throughout online matchmaking. This study therefore explores the mechanisms through which algorithmic logic influences young people's online matchmaking practices and intimate relationship construction. Methods: Participants included 27 young adults with experience using online matchmaking applications (14 women and 13 men; born in the 1990s). Data were collected through the Walkthrough Method, netnography, and semi-structured interviews. Guided by the coding procedures of Grounded Theory, data were analyzed using NVivo 14 through open, axial, and selective coding. Results: Three main themes were identified, each corresponding to one research question: (a) patterns of online matchmaking practices; (b) mechanisms of algorithmically mediated intimacy construction; and (c) algorithmic perception, negotiation, and resistance. Together, these themes illustrate the dynamic interplay between algorithmic logic, platform affordances, and young people's relational practices throughout the construction of intimate relationships. Discussion: Drawing on a sociology of technology perspective, particularly Foucault's theory of technology and technological embodiment theory, the findings demonstrate that algorithmic logic functions as an active socio-technical force rather than merely a recommendation mechanism. This study proposes a process-oriented framework of algorithmically mediated intimacy construction, highlighting how young people continuously negotiate and reconstruct intimate relationships through interactions with platform algorithms. Future research should further examine this framework across different cultural contexts and platform environments.

Indexed as

algorithmic logicdigital societyemotional interactiononline datingyouth-young adults

Identifiers

PMID42835446
PMCPMC13635324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.