ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Untargeted LC-QToF-MS profiling of the soybean (
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Compartment-resolved metabolite baselines for legumes grown under field conditions are notably scarce. Most root exudate data are obtained from hydroponic or pot systems using targeted assays. These methods fail to accurately represent the soil-borne and microbially derived chemical environments surrounding roots Methods: We employed untargeted liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-QToF-MS) to analyze four compartments of a field-grown soybean system in Hadoti, southeastern Rajasthan, India. These included non-rhizospheric bulk soil (NRBS), rhizospheric soil (RS), surface-sterilized (SRS), and unsterilized (SRU) roots, with three replicates each. We aimed to identify compartment-specific metabolic signatures and potential plant-microbe interaction mediators. As data were obtained at the MS1 level without tandem-MS confirmation, all annotations are putative, in accordance with Metabolomics Standards Initiative Levels 2-3. Results: Principal component analysis distinguished the root compartments, whereas the soil compartments were differentiated along the first component with overlapping confidence regions. Set analyses revealed 43 features exclusive to RS and 120 features exclusive to SRU. Soil chemistry differed markedly between NRBS and RS: available phosphorus, potassium, zinc, and manganese were lower in the rhizosphere, whereas exchangeable aluminium was approximately 15 times higher and was the sole element accumulating in the root zone. Among the ecological features, root colonization correlated with reduced abundance of jasmonic acid features and increased abundance of isoflavonoid features (including daidzein) and microbial siderophores. Although substantial, these differences did not withstand false discovery rate correction and are reported as candidate observations. Discussion: The observed patterns align with established models of nutrient mobilization, symbiotic signalling, and iron competition. However, targeted MS/MS validation and independent quantification are required before drawing mechanistic conclusions. The dataset serves as a hypothesis-generating baseline and provides a prioritized set of candidate features for subsequent targeted investigations of soybean root-microbe chemical interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.