Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42835438›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2026

Spaceflight human optimization and performance: positioning astronauts in an operational framework to promote health, fitness, and mission readiness.

Broderick L Dickerson, Drew E Gonzalez, Paul Comfort, John G Hardy, Kelly E Hines, Danielle N Anderson, Timothy R Macaulay, Aleksandra Stankovic, Corey A Twine

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Broderick L DickersonExercise and Sport Nutrition Lab, Department of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Drew E GonzalezExercise and Sport Nutrition Lab, Department of Kinesiology and Sport Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.
Paul ComfortDirectorate of Psychology and Sport, University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom.
John G HardyNASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Kelly E HinesEmergency Responder Human Performance Laboratory, Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, United States.
Danielle N AndersonUnited States Air Force, Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Timothy R MacaulayNASA Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Aleksandra StankovicCenter for Space Medicine Research, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Corey A TwineKBR Wyle Services, LLC., Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimizing astronaut mission readiness is a multidisciplinary endeavor that should integrate concepts from aerospace medicine, human performance, sports science, nutrition, and engineering. Situating astronauts within a theoretical framework similar to that of operational athletes, while addressing top human systems capability needs outlined for future missions, may be optimal for promoting sustained health and performance before, during, and after missions to low-Earth orbit, the lunar surface, and Mars. Mission readiness can be optimized by enhancing physiological and behavioral/psychological performance through data-driven and individualized exercise countermeasures, health and performance monitoring, precision nutrition, and rehabilitation strategies. Appropriate and stable space food systems that facilitate adequate provision of nutrients and fluids to prime astronauts for mission-critical tasks and operational demands are needed, though research is needed into potential nutritional considerations that might be useful for future missions. Behavioral readiness programs should emphasize stress inoculation, adaptive decision-making, communication, Earth-independent operation functionality, conflict resolution, leadership, and team-based problem-solving before flight to promote healthy team dynamics in-flight, along with proper society reintegration and uptake of family and occupational roles post-flight. Exercise remains an essential countermeasure during spaceflight, with an emphasis on maximizing fitness before launch to mitigate in-flight declines and on maintaining fitness levels and functionality during flight through high-intensity multimodal exercise. Following return to Earth, rehabilitative programs serve to restore cardiovascular, sensorimotor, and skeletal function, followed by enhancing skill-based performance components through a phase-based training program. Continuous monitoring systems that provide insight into health, performance, sleep, cognitive, nutritional, and recovery status should enable data-driven decision-making on physical readiness across all mission phases. By integrating insight from multiple disciplines, this unifying approach delivers a theoretical framework for sustaining astronaut health and performance during extended-duration missions.

Indexed as

behavioral healthexercise countermeasureslong-duration spaceflightoperational readinessspace food systems

Identifiers

PMID42835438
PMCPMC13635894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.