Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42835403›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2026

Proposal to refine the mechanistic classification of chronic pain and corresponding clinical symptomatology.

Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jean-Pascal LefaucheurUR4391 (ENT Team), Faculty of Health, Paris Est Créteil University, Créteil, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The management and treatment of patients suffering from chronic pain must be based on a precise understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the syndrome. However, it cannot be defined solely by the presence or absence of disease or injury affecting either non-neuronal tissues or the neuronal structures of the somatosensory system, as these elements do not always accurately or causally reflect the underlying mechanisms of the pain experienced by patients. The current taxonomy of chronic pain classically includes three main mechanisms: nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic. However, certain ambiguities of this classification need clarification, such as: (1) the importance given to demonstrating a lesion of the somatosensory nervous system for the diagnosis of neuropathic pain; (2) the specificity of sensory descriptors for the diagnosis of neuropathic pain; (3) the imprecision of the concept of "central sensitization". In this article, a new taxonomy is proposed, identifying: (1) differential mechanisms of neuropathic pain related to "large" or "small" nerve fiber systems; (2) "sensory", "cognitive", and "emotional" components of nociplastic pain; (3) "sensory nociplastic pain", which can be distinguished from neuropathic pain by the presence of diffuse, variable, and multiform "neuropathic-like" symptoms; (4) a modulator linked to sensitization related to psychosocial vulnerability and stressors. A comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms of pain relies on a rigorous interpretation of patients' symptoms. It is particularly important to determine whether sensitization mechanisms are present from disease onset, suggesting primary nociplastic pain, or whether they emerge over time, reflecting secondary processes of nociceptive or neuropathic pain syndrome chronification.

Indexed as

chronic paindiagnosislarge fibersneuropathicnociceptivenociplasticsensitizationsmall fibers

Identifiers

PMID42835403
PMCPMC13635325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.