ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2026
Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Breast Cancer: Therapeutic-Window Engineering, Tumor Heterogeneity, and Immunotherapy Combinations.
Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have become a major therapeutic class in breast cancer, but their clinical performance cannot be predicted by antigen expression alone. This review uses therapeutic-window engineering as a unifying framework to connect ADC molecular architecture with tumor heterogeneity, clinical positioning, resistance, immune effects, and toxicity. We examine how target selection, antibody properties, linker stability, payload mechanism and membrane permeability, drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR), conjugation homogeneity, and intratumoral delivery jointly determine efficacy and safety. We then distinguish established clinical uses from investigational strategies across HER2-positive, HER2-low/ultralow, hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative, and triple-negative breast cancer, reflecting the rapid movement of ADCs into earlier treatment lines and selected early-stage settings. Rather than treating ADCs as a homogeneous class, we critically assess how payload class, linker behavior, bystander killing, Fc-mediated activity, and baseline immune context may favor or limit combinations with immune checkpoint inhibitors. We also map resistance along the delivery-to-kill cascade and integrate practical safety considerations, including interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis, hematologic toxicity, ocular events, and overlapping toxicities in combination regimens. Three principles emerge: ADC efficacy is a systems property; strategies that broaden tumor coverage may also increase normal-tissue exposure; and successful combinations require platform-specific rather than class-wide rationale. Future progress will depend on biomarker-guided sequencing, rational platform selection, and safety-adapted optimization of the therapeutic window.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.