ArticleCase reports in dermatological medicine2026
Hypereosinophilia With Organ Damage Secondary to Dupilumab Therapy: A Case Report and Literature Review.
Article in Case reports in dermatological medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition characterized by pruritic, scaly, erythematous lesions, xerosis, and lichenification. Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting I- (IL)-4 and IL-13 signaling, is widely used to treat moderate to severe AD. We report a 22 year-old male with a history of asthma and chronic childhood AD who was started on dupilumab 300 mg every 2 weeks after multiple relapses despite topical therapy. Baseline Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Physician Global Assessment (PGA) scores were not recorded; however, the patient showed marked clinical improvement of his skin disease, with a posttreatment EASI score of 1. Five months after dupilumab initiation, he presented with palpitations and pleuritic chest pain. His absolute eosinophil count was 2070 cells/μL, increased from a pretreatment baseline of 860 cells/μL, with an elevated Troponin I of 1.56 ng/mL. Electrocardiography showed normal sinus rhythm. Cardiac magnetic resonance demonstrated myocardial edema, early gadolinium enhancement, and late gadolinium enhancement involving the interventricular septum and adjacent walls, confirming myocarditis. A comprehensive workup, including antinuclear antibody, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody, renal function, a respiratory viral PCR panel, stool ova and parasites, and whole exome sequencing, excluded autoimmune, infectious, and familial causes. Computed tomography of the sinuses demonstrated moderate rhinosinusitis without invasive features. A diagnosis of eosinophilic myocarditis secondary to dupilumab-associated hypereosinophilia was made. Dupilumab was discontinued, and the patient was treated with corticosteroids and colchicine, with resolution of eosinophilia and symptoms. Although dupilumab-associated eosinophilia is usually mild and transient, this case highlights the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for rare but serious organ involvement, particularly in patients with new cardiopulmonary symptoms or baseline eosinophilia, while recognizing that routine eosinophil monitoring is not currently recommended for all patients receiving dupilumab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.