Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42835370›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026

Federated deep learning for stroke detection: a privacy-preserving, explainable CNN-LSTM framework.

Reeta Samuel, Thanapal Pandi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Reeta SamuelSchool of Computer Science Engineering and Information Systems, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.
Thanapal PandiSchool of Computer Science Engineering and Information Systems, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Strict privacy regulations in healthcare limit the centralized sharing of medical imaging data, creating challenges for developing robust and generalizable diagnostic models. Federated learning (FL) offers a privacy-preserving paradigm in which participating institutions collaboratively train a global model without directly exchanging patient images. This study presents a federated CNN-LSTM framework for privacy-preserving brain stroke classification from MRI scans, designed to learn discriminative spatial and sequential representations while retaining training data at the local client level. The proposed framework employs a CNN for hierarchical spatial feature extraction and an LSTM to model sequential dependencies among extracted features, followed by federated averaging (FedAvg) to construct the global model from local updates. Experimental evaluation on a private MRI dataset comprising 3,125 scans distributed across three non-IID clients enabled assessment under heterogeneous data distributions. The proposed federated framework achieved an accuracy of 95.20%, compared to 95.95% for centralized training, demonstrating that privacy-preserving decentralized training can achieve competitive diagnostic performance with only a marginal reduction in accuracy. Furthermore, Grad-CAM was employed to provide visual explanations of the model's predictions by highlighting the image regions that contribute to stroke classification. In five-fold cross-validation, the Federated CNN-LSTM model achieved an average accuracy of 92.10% ± 1.50%, indicating consistent performance across folds. The findings demonstrate the feasibility of combining federated learning, hybrid CNN-LSTM representation learning, and model interpretability for privacy-preserving MRI-based stroke classification, while highlighting the need for multi-center validation and larger federated deployments before clinical translation.

Indexed as

brain strokeCNNdeep learningfederated learningLSTMMRI

Identifiers

PMID42835370
PMCPMC13635322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.